Close Menu
TechBrunchTechBrunch
  • Home
  • AI
  • Apps
  • Crypto
  • Security
  • Startups
  • TechCrunch
  • Venture

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Subscribe my Newsletter for New Posts & tips Let's stay updated!

What's Hot

One of Elon Musk's longtime VCS is suing his former employer after allegedly fired

May 8, 2025

Korean telephone giant SKT data breaches timeline

May 8, 2025

AppFigures: Apple earned more than $10 billion from its US App Store commission last year

May 8, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
TechBrunchTechBrunch
  • Home
  • AI

    OpenAI seeks to extend human lifespans with the help of longevity startups

    January 17, 2025

    Farewell to the $200 million woolly mammoth and TikTok

    January 17, 2025

    Nord Security founder launches Nexos.ai to help enterprises move AI projects from pilot to production

    January 17, 2025

    Data proves it remains difficult for startups to raise capital, even though VCs invested $75 billion in the fourth quarter

    January 16, 2025

    Apple suspends AI notification summaries for news after generating false alerts

    January 16, 2025
  • Apps

    AppFigures: Apple earned more than $10 billion from its US App Store commission last year

    May 8, 2025

    Instagram thread gets video ads

    May 8, 2025

    Google deploys AI tools to protect Chrome users from fraud

    May 8, 2025

    Match to lay off 13% of staff

    May 8, 2025

    Apple tries to delay ruling that it will prohibit cutting payments for external apps

    May 8, 2025
  • Crypto

    Stripe unveils AI Foundation model for payments, revealing a “deeper partnership” with Nvidia

    May 7, 2025

    Movie Pass explores the daily fantasy platform of film buffs

    May 1, 2025

    Speaking on TechCrunch 2025: Application is open

    April 24, 2025

    Revolut, a $45 billion Neobank, recorded a profit of $1 billion in 2024

    April 24, 2025

    The new kids show will come with a crypto wallet when it debuts this fall

    April 18, 2025
  • Security

    Korean telephone giant SKT data breaches timeline

    May 8, 2025

    Powerschool paid the hacker ransom, but now the school says it's being forced

    May 8, 2025

    VC Company Insight Partners Review Personal Data Stolen During a January Hack

    May 8, 2025

    Crowdstrike says it will fire 500 workers

    May 7, 2025

    Ox Security lands fresh $60 million to scan code vulnerabilities

    May 7, 2025
  • Startups

    7 days left: Founders and VCs save over $300 on all stage passes

    March 24, 2025

    AI chip startup Furiosaai reportedly rejecting $800 million acquisition offer from Meta

    March 24, 2025

    20 Hottest Open Source Startups of 2024

    March 22, 2025

    Andrill may build a weapons factory in the UK

    March 21, 2025

    Startup Weekly: Wiz bets paid off at M&A Rich Week

    March 21, 2025
  • TechCrunch

    OpenSea takes a long-term view with a focus on UX despite NFT sales remaining low

    February 8, 2024

    AI will save software companies' growth dreams

    February 8, 2024

    B2B and B2C are not about who buys, but how you sell

    February 5, 2024

    It's time for venture capital to break away from fast fashion

    February 3, 2024

    a16z's Chris Dixon believes it's time to focus on blockchain use cases rather than speculation

    February 2, 2024
  • Venture

    One of Elon Musk's longtime VCS is suing his former employer after allegedly fired

    May 8, 2025

    Sequoia leads a $1.5 billion tender offer for sales automation startup clay

    May 8, 2025

    Bosch Ventures is turning attention to North America with a new $270 million fund

    May 8, 2025

    A comprehensive list of 2025 tech layoffs

    May 7, 2025

    Kapor Capital's managing partner Ulili Onovakpuri has left the company

    May 7, 2025
TechBrunchTechBrunch

'Reverse lookup' searches: The sneaky way police eavesdrop on tech companies to obtain personal data

TechBrunchBy TechBrunchApril 2, 20247 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Telegram LinkedIn Tumblr WhatsApp Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Telegram Email


Police in the United States are increasingly relying on controversial surveillance practices that require technology companies to hand over large amounts of user data in order to identify criminal suspects.

So-called “reverse” searches allow law enforcement and federal agencies to force big technology companies like Google to hand over information from their vast repositories of user data. These orders are not unique to Google, and any company with access to user data could be forced to hand it over, but the search giant is one of the most vulnerable to police requests for access to its database of user information. is one of the recipients of this.

For example, authorities may submit to tech companies information about all individuals who were in a particular location at a particular time based on cell phone location, or information about all individuals who searched for a particular keyword or query. You can request as such. Thanks to a recently released court order, authorities have indicated they can collect personal information about everyone who watches a particular YouTube video of hers.

Reverse lookups effectively thread a digital dragnet through user data held by tech companies to catch the information police are looking for.

Civil liberties groups say court-approved orders of this type are overbroad and unconstitutional because they could force companies to hand over information about completely innocent people unrelated to criminal charges. It is claimed that Critics worry that such court orders could allow police to prosecute people based on where they go or what they search on the internet.

So far, even the courts have not agreed on whether these orders are constitutional, and a legal challenge is likely at the U.S. Supreme Court.

Meanwhile, federal law enforcement officials are already pushing this controversial legal practice further. In one recent case, prosecutors asked Google to hand over information on everyone who accessed a particular YouTube video in order to track down a money laundering suspect.

In a recently unsealed investigative motion filed in Kentucky federal court last year, prosecutors allege that Google was not authorized to use Google accounts or IP addresses that accessed YouTube videos for one week from January 1, 2023 to January 8, 2023. “We were asked to provide records and information related to the address.” 2023. ”

As part of the sting operation, the money laundering suspect shared a YouTube link with law enforcement, who sent back two more YouTube links, according to the petition. The three videos seen by TechCrunch have nothing to do with money laundering, but had a combined total of about 27,000 views at the time of the search request. Still, prosecutors sought an order forcing Google to share information about everyone who watched those three YouTube videos that week, perhaps with the goal of compiling a list of people as prime suspects. It is assumed that the person visited some or all of the prosecutor's offices. 3 videos.

This particular court order sought access to connection logs about who accessed the videos, rather than the high-level search warrants that courts can use to force tech companies to hand over content, which would require traditional investigation. It was easier for law enforcement to obtain than a warrant. Someone's private message.

A federal court in Kentucky granted the search order under seal and blocked its publication for one year. Google was barred from disclosing the request until last month, when the court order expired. Forbes first reported the existence of the court order.

It's unclear whether Google has complied with the order, but a Google spokesperson told TechCrunch that they were not sure.

Liana Pfefferkorn, a researcher at Stanford University's Internet Observatory, said this is a “perfect example” of why civil liberties advocates have long criticized these types of court orders that give police access to citizens' intrusive information. “Example,” he said.

“The government essentially dragged YouTube into service for the federal government to act as a honeypot for ensnaring criminal suspects by triangulating who viewed the videos in question during a specific time period.” Pfefferkorn said of the recent order targeting YouTube users. “However, by seeking information about everyone who watched any of the three videos, as well as a geolocation reverse search warrant, the investigation is targeting dozens or hundreds of others who are not suspected of wrongdoing.” may also be targeted.”

Seeking a digital haystack

Reverse court orders and warrants are largely a problem created by Google itself, in part because the tech giant has access to vast amounts of information about its users, including browsing history, web searches, and even detailed location data. This is due to the fact that we have been collecting data for many years. Recognizing that big tech companies hold vast amounts of users' location data and search queries, law enforcement agencies are now targeting individual users as well as granting broad access to tech companies' databases. began to succeed in persuading courts to do so.

Court-authorized search orders allow police to request information from technology and telephone companies about people whom law enforcement believes are involved in crimes that have occurred or are about to occur. But instead of trying to find a suspect by looking for a needle in a digital haystack, police are searching for clues, even if they contain the personal information of innocent people. It is supposed to ask for a portion.

Using the same techniques that request the identities of people who view YouTube videos, law enforcement agencies can ask Google to identify all individuals who were at a particular place and time, or who searched the Internet for a particular query. You can also request that we hand over data that identifies you.

A geofencing warrant, as it is more commonly known, allows police to draw a shape on a map around a crime scene or place of interest, indicating that someone using a cell phone was in the area at some point. requests large amounts of location data from the Google database. .

Police may also use so-called “keyword search” warrants, which can identify all users who searched for a keyword or search term within a time period, usually to find clues about suspects investigating crimes in advance. can.

Both of these warrants are valid because Google stores detailed location data and search queries for billions of users around the world.

Law enforcement agencies may champion surveillance and collection technology with an uncanny ability to capture even the most elusive criminal suspects. However, many innocent people have been mistakenly caught in the web of these investigations, and in some cases as criminal suspects, simply because they had phone data that put them near the crime scene.

Google's practice of collecting as much data as possible about its users makes it a prime target and a top recipient of reverse lookup warrants, but these controversial court orders Google isn't alone. Tech companies large and small that store large amounts of readable user data could be forced to hand over to law enforcement. Microsoft, Snap, Uber, and Yahoo (which owns TechCrunch) have all received reverse orders of user data.

Some companies choose not to store user data, while others scramble the data to make it inaccessible to anyone but the user. This prevents companies from handing over access to data they don't have or don't have access to, especially when laws change daily, such as when the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to access abortion. .

Google is gradually shutting down its ability to respond to geofencing warrants, specifically by moving where it stores user location data. Instead of centralizing vast amounts of users' precise location histories on its own servers, Google will begin storing location data directly on users' devices, forcing police to obtain data directly from device owners. There is. Still, Google has so far left open the possibility of receiving search requests asking for information about users' search queries and browsing history.

But as Google and other companies are finding out the hard way, the only way for companies to avoid handing over customer data is to not have it in the first place.



Source link

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Related Posts

Korean telephone giant SKT data breaches timeline

May 8, 2025

Powerschool paid the hacker ransom, but now the school says it's being forced

May 8, 2025

VC Company Insight Partners Review Personal Data Stolen During a January Hack

May 8, 2025

Crowdstrike says it will fire 500 workers

May 7, 2025

Ox Security lands fresh $60 million to scan code vulnerabilities

May 7, 2025

NSO Groups must pay WhatsApp more than $167 million in damages for Spyware Campaign

May 6, 2025

Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Top Reviews
Editors Picks

7 days left: Founders and VCs save over $300 on all stage passes

March 24, 2025

AI chip startup Furiosaai reportedly rejecting $800 million acquisition offer from Meta

March 24, 2025

20 Hottest Open Source Startups of 2024

March 22, 2025

Andrill may build a weapons factory in the UK

March 21, 2025
About Us
About Us

Welcome to Tech Brunch, your go-to destination for cutting-edge insights, news, and analysis in the fields of Artificial Intelligence (AI), Cryptocurrency, Technology, and Startups. At Tech Brunch, we are passionate about exploring the latest trends, innovations, and developments shaping the future of these dynamic industries.

Our Picks

One of Elon Musk's longtime VCS is suing his former employer after allegedly fired

May 8, 2025

Korean telephone giant SKT data breaches timeline

May 8, 2025

AppFigures: Apple earned more than $10 billion from its US App Store commission last year

May 8, 2025

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Subscribe my Newsletter for New Posts & tips Let's stay updated!

© 2025 TechBrunch. Designed by TechBrunch.
  • Home
  • About Tech Brunch
  • Advertise with Tech Brunch
  • Contact us
  • DMCA Notice
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.